Later, Blainville ( 1827, p . 660, in the corrections and additions to his " Manuel de Malacologie " ) stated that " Thracia pubescens " should be excluded.
2.
The first formal fixation for this genus was by Deshayes ( 1830 ) in the entry for " Thracia " of " Dictionnaire classique d'histoire naturelle " vol . 16, where he wrote, " C'est de cette mani�re que nous avons su que cette belle esp�ce [ " Thracia pubescens " ] �tait devenue le type d'un nouveau genre du zoologiste anglais . " However, Deshayes also describes " Thracia pubescens " as new species, based on a specimen in the Brongniart collection with a manuscript label by Leach, which makes it separately available, homonymous and synonymous with " Thracia pubescens"
3.
The first formal fixation for this genus was by Deshayes ( 1830 ) in the entry for " Thracia " of " Dictionnaire classique d'histoire naturelle " vol . 16, where he wrote, " C'est de cette mani�re que nous avons su que cette belle esp�ce [ " Thracia pubescens " ] �tait devenue le type d'un nouveau genre du zoologiste anglais . " However, Deshayes also describes " Thracia pubescens " as new species, based on a specimen in the Brongniart collection with a manuscript label by Leach, which makes it separately available, homonymous and synonymous with " Thracia pubescens"
4.
The first formal fixation for this genus was by Deshayes ( 1830 ) in the entry for " Thracia " of " Dictionnaire classique d'histoire naturelle " vol . 16, where he wrote, " C'est de cette mani�re que nous avons su que cette belle esp�ce [ " Thracia pubescens " ] �tait devenue le type d'un nouveau genre du zoologiste anglais . " However, Deshayes also describes " Thracia pubescens " as new species, based on a specimen in the Brongniart collection with a manuscript label by Leach, which makes it separately available, homonymous and synonymous with " Thracia pubescens"
मोबाइल